Question #79

Reading: Reading 8 Intercorporate Investments

PDF File: Reading 8 Intercorporate Investments.pdf

Page: 35

Status: Unattempted

Correct Answer: A

Part of Context Group: Q78-79
Shared Context
- If Flitenight were to account for its Rocky Mountain investment as an investment in financial assets instead of the equity method, Flitenight's 2004 income statement would reflect its investment in Rocky Mountain by including which of the following? A) Nothing, since the cost of the acquisition is not adjusted until the asset is sold. B) Only income of $200,000. C) Only a loss of $160,000.
Question
Regarding Basten's and Matthews' statements about the gain/loss that Flitenight had at the end of 2004 on its investment in Rocky Mountain, which is most accurate?
Answer Choices:
A. Basten’s statement is correct and Matthews’ statement is incorrect
B. Basten’s statement is incorrect and Matthews’ statement is correct
C. Basten’s statement is correct and Matthews’ statement is correct
Explanation
If Flitenight accounted for its Rocky Mountain investment using the equity method, the value of the investment as of December 31, 2004, would be: Flitenight's original $10 million investment + (Flitenight's share of Rocky Mountain's 2003 earnings less dividends Flitenight received in 2003) + (Flitenight's share of Rocky Mountain's 2004 earnings less dividends Flitenight received in 2004). Since we know that Flitenight owns 20% of Rocky Mountain and consequently receives 20% of the dividends that Rocky Mountain pays, we can calculate: Value of Rocky Mountain on Flitenight's books at the end of 2004 = $10 million + (0.20 × $3 million in 2003 earnings − 0.20 × $1.5 million in 2003 dividends) + (0.20 × −$800,000 in 2004 earnings − 0.20 × $1 million in 2004 dividends) = $10 million + ($600,000 − $300,000) + (−$160,000 − $200,000) = $10,000,000 + $300,000 − $360,000 = $9,940,000 Basten's statement is correct. On a cash basis, Flitenight spent $10 million to acquire its stake in Rocky Mountain, and received $500,000 (= $300,000 in 2003 dividends + $200,000 in 2004 dividends) in dividends over the two years. $500,000 in cash return on a $10,000,000 cash investment equals 5% over the two years. Matthews' statement is also correct.
Actions
Practice Flashcards