Question #53

Reading: Reading 1 Multiple Regression

PDF File: Reading 1 Multiple Regression.pdf

Page: 24

Status: Unattempted

Correct Answer: A

Part of Context Group: Q53-55 First in Group
Shared Context
of 139 Alex Wade, CFA, is analyzing the result of a regression analysis comparing the performance of gold stocks versus a broad equity market index. Wade believes that first lag serial correlation may be present and, in order to prove his theory, should use which of the following methods to detect its presence? A) The Breusch-Pagan test. B) The Hansen method. C) The Durbin-Watson statistic. Phillip Lee works for Song Bank as a quantitative analyst. He is currently working on a model to explain the returns (in %) of 20 hedge funds for the past year. He includes three independent variables: Market return = return on a broad-based stock index (in %) Closed = dummy variable (= 1 if the fund is closed to new investors; 0 otherwise) Prior period alpha = fund return for the prior 12 months – return on market (in %) Estimated model: hedge fund return = 3.2 + 0.22 market return + 1.65 closed – 0.11 prior period alpha Lee is concerned about the impact of outliers on the estimated regression model and collects the following information: Observation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cook's D 0.332 0.219 0.115 0.212 0.376 0.232 0.001 0.001 0.233 0.389 Observation 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Cook's D 0.089 0.112 0.001 0.001 0.219 0.001 0.112 0.044 0.517 0.212 Additionally, Lee wants to estimate the probability of a hedge fund closing to new investors, and he uses two variables: Fund size = log of assets under management Prior period alpha (defined earlier) Results are shown as follows: Variable Coefficient Intercept –3.76 Fund size –2.98 Prior period alpha –2.99
Question
What is the correct interpretation of the coefficient of closed in the first regression?
Answer Choices:
A. If a model is closed to new investors, the expected excess fund return is 1.65%
B. A closed fund is likely to generate a return of 1.65%
C. A closed fund is estimated to have an extra return of 1.65% relative to funds that are not closed
Explanation
The interpretation of the coefficient is the extra return relative to the alternative outcome.
Actions
Practice Flashcards