Question #98
Reading: Reading 27 Valuation and Analysis of Bonds With Embedded Options - Anwers
PDF File: Reading 27 Valuation and Analysis of Bonds With Embedded Options - Anwers.pdf
Page: 44
Status: Unattempted
Part of Context Group: Q97-98
Shared Context
Question
Puldo notes that the duration estimate for the two bonds is not directly comparable. Assuming that the underlying option is at- or near-the-money, the duration of one of the bonds will be lower than the other one. Indicate whether the statements made by Diffle in his memo regarding the value of the embedded option and the effect of the volatility assumption are correct.
Answer Choices:
A. Both statements are correct
B. Only the statement regarding the effect of the volatility assumption is correct
C. Only the statement regarding the value of the embedded option is correct. Explanation Statement 1 is correct. The value of the option would be the difference between the value calculated with no call feature (the Bratton bonds) and the value calculated assuming the bond is callable (the Hardin bonds). Recall that the vignette stated the Bratton and Hardin bonds were identical except for the call feature in the Hardin bonds. The option value would therefore be: 100.915 – 100.472 = 0.443. Statement 2 is also correct. Increased volatility would increase the value of the option, thus lowering the value of the callable bond. (Module 27.5, LOS 27.j)
No explanation available for this question.