Question #52

Reading: Reading 2 Time-Series Analysis

PDF File: Reading 2 Time-Series Analysis.pdf

Page: 26

Status: Unattempted

Correct Answer: A

Part of Context Group: Q52-57 First in Group
Shared Context
, Smith uses a dummy variable that equals 1 whenever the Federal government intervened with a fiscal policy stimulus package that exceeded 2% of the annual Gross Domestic Product. Smith sets the dummy variable equal to 1 for four quarters starting with the quarter in which the policy is enacted and extending through the following 3 quarters. Otherwise, the dummy variable equals zero. Smith uses quarterly data over the past 5 years to derive her regression. Smith's regression equation is provided in Exhibit 1: Exhibit 1: Foreclosure Share Regression Equation foreclosure share = b0 + b1(ΔINT) + b2(STIM) + b3(CRISIS) + ε where: Foreclosure share = the percentage of all outstanding mortgages foreclosed upon during the quarter ΔINT = the quarterly change in the 1-year Treasury bill rate (e.g., ΔINT = 2 for a two percentage point increase in interest rates) STIM = 1 for quarters in which a Federal fiscal stimulus package was in place CRISIS = 1 for quarters in which the median house price is one standard deviation below its 5-year moving average The results of Smith's regression are provided in Exhibit 2: Exhibit 2: Foreclosure Share Regression Results Variable Coefficient t-statistic Intercept 3.00 2.40 ΔINT 1.00 2.22 STIM -2.50 -2.10 CRISIS 4.00 2.35 The ANOVA results from Smith's regression are provided in Exhibit 3: Exhibit 3: Foreclosure Share Regression Equation ANOVA Table Source Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Sum of Squares Regression 3 15 5.0000 Error 16 5 0.3125 Total 19 20 Smith expresses the following concerns about the test statistics derived in her regression: Concern 1: If my regression errors exhibit conditional heteroskedasticity, my t- statistics will be underestimated. Concern 2: If my independent variables are correlated with each other, my F-statistic will be overestimated. Before completing her analysis, Smith runs a regression of the changes in foreclosure share on its lagged value. The following regression results and autocorrelations were derived using quarterly data over the past 5 years ( Exhibit 4 and Exhibit 5, respectively): Exhibit 4. Lagged Regression Results Δ foreclosure sharet = 0.05 + 0.25(Δ foreclosure sharet– 1) Exhibit 5. Autocorrelation Analysis Lag Autocorrelation t-statistic 1 0.05 0.22 2 -0.35 -1.53 3 0.25 1.09 4 0.10 0.44 Exhibit 6 provides critical values for the Student's t-Distribution Exhibit 6: Critical Values for Student's t-Distribution Area in Both Tails Combined Degrees of Freedom 20% 10% 5% 1% 16 1.337 1.746 2.120 2.921 17 1.333 1.740 2.110 2.898 18 1.330 1.734 2.101 2.878 19 1.328 1.729 2.093 2.861 20 1.325 1.725 2.086 2.845
Question
The most appropriate interpretation from the foreclosure share regression equation model is:
Answer Choices:
A. Multiple-R of the model is 0.75
B. Multiple-R of the model is 0.87
C. Variable STIM explains 37.5% of the variation in foreclosure share
Explanation
R2 = RSS/SST = 15/20 = 0.75 Multiple-R = (0.75)0.50 = 0.87. Correct interpretation of the coefficient of determination is that all the independent variables (ΔINT, STIM, CRISIS) collectively help explain 75% of the variation in the independent variable (Foreclosure Share).
Actions
Practice Flashcards