Question #27
Reading: Reading 23 Residual Income Valuation
PDF File: Reading 23 Residual Income Valuation.pdf
Page: 12
Status: Correct
Correct Answer: B
Question
An argument for using the residual income (RI) valuation approach is that residual income valuation:
Answer Choices:
A. facilitates comparisons between divisions
B. encourages company managers to maximize ROI
C. reduces the problem of terminal value dominating total value. Jon Binkster, CFA, has decided to determine the value of the equity in Busicomb Inc. using the residual income method. Binkster has obtained financial statements for the year ended December 20x5. These financial statements are included in Exhibits 1–3 below. Exhibit 1 Busicomb Inc. Annual Income Statement
Explanation
Terminal value does not dominate total present value as is the case in dividend and free
cash flow valuation models. Both remaining responses are arguments against using the RI
approach.
(Module 23.5, LOS 23.i)
Jon Binkster, CFA, has decided to determine the value of the equity in Busicomb Inc. using the residual
income method. Binkster has obtained financial statements for the year ended December 20x5. These
financial statements are included in Exhibits 1–3 below.
Exhibit 1
Busicomb Inc. Annual Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 20x5 (in $ millions)
Sales
721.9
Operating expenses
(417.0)
Operating profit
304.9
Gain on sale of fixed assets
9.6
Depreciation
(170.8)
Earnings before interest and tax
143.7
Interest expense
(40.3)
Pre-tax income
103.4
Income taxes
(31.0)
Net income
72.4
Exhibit 2
Busicomb Inc. Balance Sheet
As of December 31 (in $ millions)
20x5
20x4
Current Asset
Cash and equivalents
31.2
14.0
Accounts receivable
72.0
64.8
Inventories
501.7
453.7
Total current assets
604.9
532.5
Non-Current Assets
Property, plant, and equipment
1138.7
982.7
Less: Accumulated depreciation
(370.0) (216.0)
Net property, plant, and equipment
768.7
766.7
Total assets
1373.6
1299.2
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable
60.1
62.5
Notes payable
30.0
20.0
Total current liabilities
90.1
82.5
Non-Current Liabilities
Long term debt
576.0
588.0
Total liabilities
666.1
670.5
Shareholders' Equity
Common equity
384.0
360.0
Retained earnings
323.5
268.7
Total equity
707.5
628.7
Total liabilities and equity
1373.6
1299.2
Exhibit 3
Busicomb Inc. Cash Flow Statement
For the Year ended December 31, 20x5 (in $ millions)
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Net income
72.4
Depreciation
170.8
Gain on sale of fixed assets
(9.6)
Change in Working Capital
(Increase) Decrease in accounts receivable
(7.2)
(Increase) Decrease in inventories
(48.0)
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable
(2.4)
Net change in working capital
(57.6)
Net cash from operating activities
176.0
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Purchase of property, plant, and equipment
(183.2)
Proceeds on disposal of plant and equipment
20.0
Net cash from investing activities
(163.2)
12.8
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Change in debt outstanding
(2.0)
Change in common stock
24.0
Payment of cash dividend
(17.6)
Net cash from financing activities
4.4
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
17.2
Cash at beginning of period
14.0
Cash at end of period
31.2
You can assume for the following question that the ROE of Busicomb Inc. is 12% and the cost of equity
is 13% and the long-term sustainable rate of growth is 7.5%.
Binkster is concerned about the rate of growth he has assumed for the model and is aware that the
residual income model can be used to calculate the implied rate of growth. He has compiled the
following data for Entrebus Inc., a competitor, and wants to use this to calculate the implied rate of
growth for Entrebus Inc.:
The price to book ratio
2.50
ROE
13%
Current book value per share $8.00
Cost of equity
11%
Despite the issues encountered with post levered residual income Binkster is convinced that value
based management approaches will prove beneficial in the analysis of Busicomb. His attention alights
on another method referred to as Economic Value Added (EVA). Binkster makes the following estimates
for Busicomb Inc. for 20x6:
EBIT
$150m
Tax rate
30%
Cost of equity 12%
Cost of debt
7%
The target debt to equity ratio for next year will be 1.
The invested capital is to be calculated as long-term debt plus stockholders' equity (using the
information from the Exhibits 1–3).
Jon Binkster and a colleague, Bob Slacker, were discussing the merits of the residual income approach.
Bob commented that the unrealized gains or losses relating to available for sale securities are reported
in comprehensive income and not the income statement and that this results in earnings being an
inaccurate measure of returns to investors. Bob states that the book value of equity is not affected.
Binkster commented that including the gains or losses from one-off asset sales in income would distort
the estimation of future residual earnings and therefore these gains and losses should be excluded.
However, there is no need to adjust the book value of equity.